Trading Pokemon Mac Nds

"ANGELS" By Igor Igor Sibaldi

"ANGELS" By Igor Sibaldi : "'THE ANGELS' By Igor Sibaldi"

Does Coffee Weakens Enamel Tooth

Sibaldi - 101

Igor Sibaldi ( Milan, Italy , 15 June 1957), born from Russian mother and Italian father, is an Italian writer, scholar of theology and history of religion. Sibaldi is the author of Numerous works on the Scripture  and  shamanism . He regularly holds conferences and seminars in Italy and abroad about mythology ,  exegesis  and  depth psychology . He worked for a long time on  angelology  in  Jewish tradition , equalizing it to an ancient form of  psychology . His favourite style is the essay-novel form. He has published, among the others,  The Invisible Teachers   (Mondadori)  The forbidden fruit of knowledge   (Frassinelli)  The Ark of the new Masters   (Frassinelli)  The invisible world   (Frassinelli) Book of Angels   (Frassinelli) and new translations of Genesis (   The creation of the universe , Sperling and Kupfer) and the Gospel of John ( The Code of the Secret Gospel , Sperling and Kupfer).


Igor Sibaldi - 101 desideri

Convert A Pull Start Outboard To Electric

Secularism

against the laws created by men, men are obedient to the law, violators of the law men and women who defend the law. But the man just does not say: I am with the law so I have military in the ranks of law enforcement. The right man is simply the law and ensure the integrity of the law to prevent law enforcement to ensure protection of the law by acts contrary to law. There is a divine law, and there are men who are acting against the law of God and men who fight in the name of the triumph of God's law. But your place is out of sides, guarding the divine law that no one can touch it, so that it retains its integrity, and pure, immaculate, bright, can be shown as a supreme warning to litigants on both sides.

G. Guareschi

Diagram Of An Anotated Theodalite

want to trust herself

trust himself, instead of "other" is the prerequisite to wisdom. The first step in any spiritual growth, the trick is in fact an act of freedom and self-ego, perceiving, in all matters relating to the invisible one is for me a little creative act, a DO (which produces both lower results, as those who doubted you), and also to reflect on these results, or read the sacred texts, myths or understanding is possible only if we start from a question "What does all this with me? What something tells me my life? " and if you give in this matter, more important than any other.

A lot of people this seems too much improponibile.Dà vertigo: trust him and only him, too contrasts with what, from childhood, was taught by nearly all, that their ego is a source of truth values \u200b\u200band immeasurably inferior to the conventions, rules, authorities, the existing criteria in the WORLD.

It 's a real imprinting, which may continue to act for life: determine, yes, a sense of discomfort, more or less secret, but most seem to be able to cope better if they behave with those who smaller as the others had done with them, that is, convincing them that trust in themselves cause nothing but trouble. Which leads to a "consensus", a formidable complicity against the autonomy of the individual. The reconquest of the self-confidence, therefore, requires commitment, courage and, unfortunately, a long time.

aspects that assumes lack of faith in ourselves are:

1) Decisions are not taken, we are trying to hide from ourselves: we have not dared to use talents, but that we are not off; clarifications that we have not dared to claim in our relationships with others; clarifications that we have not dared to face with ourselves: what I want, What I really like ... etc Is at this stage, and in all other do not need to impose mandatory life changes, but only to notice the issues in question and understand what should be done to overcome them;

2) behavioral and psychosomatic problems caused by our lack of regard for ourselves: Inability to relax, unwind, enjoy a fear of pleasure, fear of saying what we think 8 that usually goes hand in hand with asthma), fear of admitting that we want to live anywhere else (which is characteristic of those who suffer from skin diseases), and the fear of examining our resentment characteristic of the obese), etc. .. From "Vocabulary" SOUL EDITION

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=153797417999759

Ibm Thinkcentre 8215 Lan Drivers

RESISTANCE

I mean by this term feel very precise and well-known anyone who has tried any spiritual quest or self-analysis: at some point something, you know what, prevents you from continuing, it makes you feel weak, confused, incompetent, and the more you strive to shake off, especially something that takes paralizza.Può strength and you made while you're thinking, or praying, or especially while you are indicating some desire that seems particularly important.

Many in these cases, give up and declare: "I can not! Not for me ...". Other more agile, ask those who know more than loro.Altri again, sooner or later learn that the resistance are in fact the most precious moments of inner growth, which in essence is nothing if not research and overcoming our resistance gradually larger.

It refers to that the passage of the Gospels: "It is more fun the sky for one who has noticed his sins, not ninety-nine righteous who do not need to notice anything." (Luke 15:7)

The Resistance is in fact the moment we begin realizing some of our situation painfully unresolved, while the "ninety-nine" are what in fact we did not need to notice anything, as is already proceeding very well: and it "is more rejoicing in heaven" for our strengths, not for our good proceed, simply because if there is a way to overcome resistance we ourselves, and then to grow, to discover new things, and where everything goes well we tend to stay where we already are. (A technological equivalent of this situation is given by the bulb, in which the wire corresponds to the "ninety-nine" and the tungsten filament, which gives light, is precisely the resistance.) Ensure that our personal strengths to give light, moreover, is quite facile.Quando it receives, simply ask: "Why do I feel so now?" What I found in my heart that holds me back? What scares me? ". And, once the resistance has turned into a question like this, it is already the tungsten filament, which will light up and illuminate many things, when it crossed the stream, that is, from an authentic desire to obtain a risposta.Da " VOCABULARY "Soul editions

Labelled Viking Lonboat

willpower 'Freedom and Responsibility

It 'important to have the will? In what sense?

is obvious that the will is important: "if you want," etc. ... for what I know about the will, but I think it is interesting to note that this work in practice.

In the life of a person realize the different situations: when a person wants something, that is for sure , and when a person does not want something, that is for sure, because " not "not important. If you think about something that not want you there and focus on, and still think, at some point find a way to put together a series of systems for which then you do not want that to happen.

It 's easy to think that both ways: if a person has a objective, his memory acts selectively on the basis of this . We know that we do not remember all that we see but a selection. The perception is selective, but everything that is on the borderline between perception and memory is not so clear in the sense that in general we think that something exists when it is perceived and you can not remember, but it also hand etc, and then the mechanism is not so obvious.

However, if I have a purpose and want to achieve, for example entering a room I see a dozen objects in 20 seconds. If someone comes after me, at the same time we realize this, in turn, a dozen items ... If we list both what we saw, we would obtain two lists are completely different, being that I select the world according to what I want

.

This is true even for what I do not want . If something and I do not want to drive over there, obviously I'll see what I do not want anyway ... Then stated that if a person wants one thing, this is the case, and if he does not want one thing, this happens.

It 's interesting to see, however, what situations are not realized: you are what you want . The verb "shall" and the verb "will" are like two entities that both have the same "charge" and then repel each other ... If I want okay ... If I I want something, but not'll never get.

why most people do not make money, because all of them think they want the money, in reality very few people want money because money is not that there is much to be desired: as an instrument, possibly money allows you to go to anything else you want . Instead, people say "I want the money," and because they want the money? Why does everyone think in this way: "I'm not the only mica fool I do not want the money?" Then I have to force me to want the money, "and because" I have to want to "fail.

Another example: I establish that I find a boyfriend, then I will a boyfriend and, oddly enough, since I decided that I need a boyfriend, I can not ever find it. .. (And also by those two guys that I had noticed, did not come out of nothing). This is one of the reasons that usually rains in the wet, and who has a girlfriend, for example, we can find many more and when they do not, can not realize a story, and all persons that is not going well.

Among other things, the to want is an annihilator of tremendous creativity, and makes the memory select your experiences that you do not need and that are outside of your lens. And if you put all much the will that can, for example, 50 thousand units "will" and only 1 unit of "I" of the fact have to want something that makes you come to realize, but at the wrong time, wrong way and that in the end will not work.

Therefore, in general, people realize too late that you have the wrong life, when maybe you are going to die ... because for all their lives, have decided to have to want things and have not obtained, or obtained the information they have not received any joy.

As for the will, one of the worst poisons that there on this and that, though widespread, not everyone comes to discover is that many people think "I want a certain thing" but do not really want them but it is the desire of someone else . E 'the desire of the mother or father who has not been achieved and they want to accomplish in some way, or even it is the desire of a classmate who admired so much when they were kids ... "Look at that guy who wanted that thing ... he certainly will not see that but I'll get it" and maybe even get to claim them, after a terrific effort and without joy, lasting many years, to find out - eventually - that not worth nothing.

(From an interview nonsoloanima.tv)

Blood Test What Can They Find?

way out of situations that make us unhappy?

A normal person usually has no intention to get out of their misery , would be a bad bargain would not have anything to talk about. If you have back pain or something you went wrong, then there is much to talk about, and others are also to hear why, as you complain, they are almost assured of being better than you.

In reality no one is convinced of really exist: in a normal society and civil everyone know that they are more or less a tool, a cog in a machine, then when you can stop and say "ouch, it hurts here," "how unfortunate" or "guy left me ..." I bought our value, importance.

often not go to the doctor to be healed - would be a great spite if the doctor did - but to seek treatment. It remains there as long as possible and are willing to pay a lot even if the doctor is there to hear and say "I". For example, during my consultations (Editor's note - of angelology) happens regularly that one in ten people complain because it is not private but public, in front of others because there is no room for such things ... and that is exactly what the purpose. The doctor can say "I ... I ... I ..." and "care of me" rather than the type of indication that I think is right is to "take care of yourself - not "I have to deal with you." Only when a person begins to deal with it the ability to talk suddenly collapses ...

Imagine, for example, that our energy costs is indicated by a meter as the gas. The counter of a person who complains must be very fast in the sense that the energy expenditure of a person who is explaining what the suffering is huge, it's like downloading a truck, as if he went to the gym, and then is happy .. . The share of energy that a person has a daily basis is usually very high, and in modern civilization where we eat three times a day, you move always in the car etc.., you have very few opportunities to consume this reserve then, since you do not know what to do, you download complaining and telling their problems . In this way the evening you are tired and you can sleep, insomnia else takes over ...

Otherwise, if an individual uses the only existing way to be valid with immediate effect and that is not happy note, give absolutely no weight to the negative things he sees around, and but only see things that are worth see and enjoy - which is hard to do - then begins to feel wonderfully well. At that point, then gives way to fear ... because the problem is that when you start to feel good , its amount of energy is increasing dramatically, an individual's risk of becoming like a lunatic, because he does not know what to do absolutely any job and becomes unsuitable.

In our civilization we perform jobs that require very little energy compared to that you have, and then all this energy that advances should be employed in some way. Also because this unused energy at a certain point it becomes disease - than those who consume the excess energy as that required for a cold start, produce all that mucus, inflammation, etc. ...

As I said, to really get out the attitude of unhappiness is to go around the city and avoid dwelling on notice or anything that is not acceptable, and instead impose note that only like that. A person may be ugly, nasty, greasy, bad, violent ... but you can see that his shoes are very beautiful ("beautiful shoes that you saw that?") and not spend energy in this, then go to buy now as we'd spent an afternoon to find the shoes that I liked ...

To use energy, there are two channels essential creativity and sexuality.

- then there is something other than the sick and complaining ...

make space for creativity to experiment with various situations, as well as sexuality can become very active, but the excess energy at the base and sometimes it's really not enough to be creative and have a regular sex life. We need to find something really significant a away like a nuclear physicist, a saint, a poet ... but some have only read four books in his life, and what can do this? That is not to find something to complain about ... complaining neighbor, the boss at work, that other problem, and more, so that they may feel tired, sleepy and sit up with a nice coffee.

My Toe Hurts When Touched

"I do not know, I do not know who I am ..." here, comes to mind that song by Mina, very nice, about limits. I do not know, and when I say you know me I'm lying ... because they are a lot bigger than what I think I am. From this point of view, the responsibility for what is one of the most socially useful aspects, it can be a way to keep me at bay, to resign myself to what little I know I am.

Let me explain. Socrates said "I know I do not know"; applied to this speech, it becomes "I do not know what to be, I am what I inside me does not know how big " ... what ; is my ego. Then, the responsibility, if they equate to behave, to act according to certain patterns, etc.. Can be a major obstacle. Freedom, however, also understood as "evil", that is as capricious, spiteful, irregularities, something very useful, because it lets you see how far you can get.

People frequently very afraid of two things: make mistakes, and be wrong. In fact, is wrong is being wrong is what is on happen, because in this way and discover you know to be different from what you thought . The responsible person is not wrong, that's right ... people who do not make mistakes do not I do not like at all, I suspect they create ... to be clear, I hear a little 'too ... limited.

theological An example: David, at some point, does something inappropriate, falls in love with the wife of his general, Uriah. This woman married to Uriah to him like a lot, and decided to do something horrible: he gives orders to his soldiers so that, during a fight, Urijah leading up to and beyond the enemy camp, and so leave the massacre. Uria, poor, lost his life in this way and David took possession of his widow. And it's a bad thing, a dreadful situation, right? But it so happens that this woman was Bathsheba, and Solomon was born from this story. David had a seventy between lovers and wives, but not with these that gives life to Solomon, who instead was born out of a bad thing ... and is the greatest of kings.

This is part of that whole chapter of theology of providence by which a person does not know, do not know whether and to what extent his freedom, freedom to fail , freedom not to be himself, can be a guide for self-discovery. From an interview with Camilla Ripani (nonsolo anima.tv)

Freedom and Responsibility

Can Genital Herpes Look Like A Scratch?

Via Bel

Małgorzata Mleczko Psycholog

See Low Lamporecchio (PT)

Wedding Invitation Wording For Friends

The Secretary of the Democratic Party and the League's complaint

In recent weeks the political front has not remained idle and led me to confront the new Secretary of the Democratic Party Matera.

E ', of course, premature to explain any form of optimism for the future, much less than it is to sing Win or publicly propose a course of active tissue reconstruction of PD Matera.

prefer to express optimism about the present.

And frankly, the facts already acquired for the working methodology proposal for the reasons expressed.

The Democratic Party has often been harshly criticized on these pages myself.

But I think I can afford, as well as content and manufacturer of force.

In my first experience of this kind I have experienced the common desire to turn the page.

But these are intentions.

laudable intentions, but still.

We'll see if I will be able to help turn them into facts.

Why is it that we have done urgently.

And the facts are not lacking.

The Democratic Party is the only Italian political organization to have preserved the fundamental word "party" in its name. I have been pointed out with pride.

PDL, FLI, SEL, IDV, all left without a party, all parties on a personal basis.

The Democratic Party has all the defects you want, but it is the last barrier remained between us and the Caesarism institutionalized.

This is a fact.

That does not hide the others, painful facts about the PD.

But it is certainly a starting point.

Why, with all the flaws of this world, the PD has its strength in the infrastructure of culture and ideas built in the time that it was time to put to good use.

Looking beyond the bunga bunga, in fact, are much more concerned about what happens in the Veneto region where the institutions have crumbled in the incredible squalor of the League's hunting book.

After the death of our soldiers in Afghanistan this is the news of the week.

Even books Saviano, with timing to be consumed Torquemada, have gone to the index.

These are real monsters that begin to physically walk around the streets of the country, probably unaware of just be reincarnation of an evil already seen.

is why it is in the party par excellence, the container of a plurality physically true, that there may be an alternative to a future of the tribunes.

is why I think it is worthwhile to work in the PD: it is one of the last lines of defense is not collective much to the appearance of the Knight and his scandals, as against the counterculture of the personalism that sleazy actions such as those seen in the censorship of books, the current practice of the future that awaits us if we fail.

And we will fail.

Formula For Recurring Deposits Interest

without direction is a direction (the head in the sand)

Okay, the direction of PD has been how it went.

That is, if it were not for the circumstances, not too bad.

Unfortunately, the circumstances are.

An unprecedented attempt to crush the concept of work as it is understood in the West from the first post-war period is currently underway.

is designed to shamelessly suck more energy to the country for the opportunity for the ruling classes to maintain their privileges.

The crisis in the country worsens steadily while a few kilometers similar phenomena have already taken to the extreme resulted in revolt.

And what does the Democratic Party?

Overall, nothing.

Its factions, however, oscillate between the positions constructive and timely and sympathetic output of the mayors of Florence and Turin in favor of Marchionne.

As a good self-employed person who dreams them certain rights (say, a month of annual leave or illness, yes and no if I do leave a year and 8 days with a fever to 38 to confirm that it works great), I could fuck frankly, a lot, for me, the worse the better.

Instead, this is the crucial stage.

not so important who wins the Yes or No.

It 'important to be able to make a choice: we must pursue

China (Doctrine Marchionne), or are we chasing Germany and Scandinavia (Jordan Option & Associates)?

The issue is that the Doctrine Marchionne is a false history: the incidence of 7% of the job worker on the production costs of the car, with focus all 'I'm little' bit 'of war on a component of this is ridiculously low objectively a pretext for social control that has little do with the financial performance of a multinational.

's why I'm quite annoyed with managers and breakers, drivers and similar: The PD

should NOT suggest to vote yes or no to the workers who are also adults and vaccinated and are living in a world impervious to the thought of this leadership.

The PD would not scream attack the rights to what are the trade unions, but the mystification of economic powers of the government and unable to build a winning strategy for the country and determined to stay there, at the top, at the expense everything.

Instead, you let the false game guiltily attract investment to lose here, the jobs there, while you pretend to forget that a firm's investment makes them serious enough and if he wants to survive.

Pass Mayor of Turin, but noted further convergence between the leadership of the movement of scrap with Berlusconi is a sad sign of genetic failure of the party.

Yet, much of the PD is a project to regenerate the country, to rebuild a strong community of national renewal, it has one, coherent and effective.

bad I do not have a voice or space.

pity.

Can Dogs Get Herpes Simplex 1

Nuclear? Of course, to blow up the alien mother ship ... and STOP! Dear

I find it incredible between the swinging and the attempt to bring criminal in nuclear power for civilian life in Italy.

Advance immediately that my statement is not ideological: the United States, for example, are a nation that could usefully, I think, welcome this form of energy use. I'm not saying that if I were the U.S. president would do, I say only that the U.S. could reasonably choose to use civilian nuclear power.

We do not.

Why?

We are facts and numbers, then we also pretend that a nuclear power plant designed and built today is immune from the risks of the Chernobyl accident or worse.

What did the U.S. that we do not?

Technology: the technology to build nuclear reactors is based on patents almost exclusively held by U.S. corporations and federal agencies. I can not estimate the percentage, but given 6 to 8 billion € (to be optimistic) the cost of a nuclear power, I doubt that the bill be paid in patents that the U.S. is a few cents. We are talking about million €.

That is: in Italy we do not build their own nuclear power stations and we have to buy much of the technology from abroad. This is true in 2010 as in 1980: statements like "Eh, but if we could continue the research that has been blocked by referendum ..." Are ridiculous than offensive in a country that is not real at all. Moreover, a referendum to certain not stopped the nuclear research.

experience. The U.S.

run from the middle decades of military and nuclear reactors.

also have experience in the management of nuclear safety levels unknown to us.

Space: The U.S.

have vast desert areas and geologically stable in which to concentrate the waste. I'm not saying that the United States the right precautions are in place, only that in the vast deserts of the West the space to store the waste there is at least in theory. We will not speak.

Availability of Fuel:

the U.S. producers of uranium and however they can access it more easily that Italy (Canada, Congo ...). Italy does not produce uranium or other fissile material. The fission power stations are powered by a mineral (low), therefore, are not considered renewable energy.

That is, we are still forced to import oil and gas import, we also need to import uranium for nuclear power as a speaker system from an independent mind to make us the obvious.

Ok, this is the country that has repeatedly voted for Berlusconi, the obvious is not a feature on which to rely, unfortunately.

is why, in my opinion, if the U.S. wanted to build a new generation of nuclear fission reactors, I believe that their choice (not disagree) are based on concrete poserebbe reasonable: they know how to build them, how to handle them, where to build (they needed to cool the giant rivers, and we are not we rely on the Po) and where to stock, even improperly, the waste. They also fuel.

We do not have any of that. Let

costs.

Md A nuclear power costs 8 € and lasts twenty years. Management costs are not known and still depend on the fuel price (in constant ascent). Those of disposal are not calculable because to date no one has ever completely eliminated a central (a few thousand tonnes of acciaiocemento radioactive). We

a practical example for my fellow citizens: If tomorrow someone decides to put a bell'impianto sports instead of Cement (in a natural park is perhaps not so farfetched a choice), you may do its calculations and put your wallet and the pick.

If, instead of cement plant there was a nuclear power plant this would not be possible since no one today is able to restore the soil occupied by a nuclear power plant under the conditions above ...

With Md of € 8 can be mounted about 2.700 GW peak of photovoltaic products of 4 GWh per annum. By coming to terms with the abacus, it means that with 8 Md € PV produce 80 GWh in 20 years. Everything from the Sun, where produce consumption because without loss, without using soil because the plant is on the roof surface cementified already the "Bel Paese is more than sufficient to accommodate the solar panels necessary to meet all needs national

Italy consumes annually 340,000 GWh per year. To produce them all with PV would install 220 to 260 GW of peak power, photovoltaic, or would need to cover just over 10,000 (but less than 20000) square miles of roof ...

All calculated costs and returns 2010.

I remind you that in Italy about 10% of the territory is built and talk with more than 30,000 square kilometers of territory already cemented.

I say that our energy needs from photovoltaics mounted on the existing ceilings will be fine in there ...

the price of the 6 stations planned, then we might get a little something from Brother Sun as 16 GW of photovoltaic peak, about 5% of our needs to be pessimistic to the cube: if the ENEL to launch a similar operation I think we at least double that figure in economies of scale and falling panel prices.

All the hefty sum of 10 € cents per kWh photovoltaic product ...

Forum nuclear, as the cost of kWh, nuclear power provides figures ranging between 7 and 20 € cent

... I mean, their numbers ...

Take my calculations with a grain of salt, partly because the data on the costs of nuclear power, as opposed to those on photovoltaics, are inconsistent and somewhat hidden.

added, however, the fact that the price of solar kWh is steadily downhill.

It turns out that nuclear energy, while dropping the problems mentioned above, will now cost maybe a little 'less solar energy will cost, but certainly more than the sun in a couple of years. ..

Given the time involved the comparison, rationally speaking, it is pitiful ...

A nuclear power plant to be built in five years, individual photovoltaic systems in a few days.

If, instead of spending the figures in this uneconomic folly would invest in renewable energy (wind power exists to give us a hand when there is no sun) would trigger a virtuous cycle that could really make us independent sources for fissile the production of electricity within a few decades.

course, the Sun at night there.

course, the wind does not always there.

But there is hydrogen.

There are already systems that directly convert solar energy into hydrogen.

Nothing forbids us to store energy in the form of hydrogen produced via solar day to use it at night, in bad weather, cars ...

Yeah, the car: a nuclear power plant does not solve the problem of gasoline: the combined cycle solar - hydrogen, however, yes.

Certainly not in 2020.

Meanwhile, in 2020, a rational country, may have already seen their oil consumption drop dramatically due to renewable energies. By then we will also be ready to abandon the station.

Provided that our money can go away in the pockets of the usual suspects advocates of nuclear technology expensive and inadequate.

Well, I've been good: I have neither raised the specter of the accident nor that of mismanagement of slag.

The only reason to resort to nuclear, I think, is to make credible the incredible science fiction film to "Independence Day" and loosen one megaton of power in the hangar of the ship and the alien invaders so bad fools to use windows so that our heroes can infect their computers and gain access ...

The rest expect a fusion reactor working, first, dear Friends atomic, do not come back here, please ...

Really, there is no need at all to decide for anti-nuclear fear.

Just do it by poverty.

And a desire to wealth.

Off White Dress With Black Beading

Marchionne, I'm not the contrary, I raise (Part Two) Dear

innovation that can still save that can not be reduced to only copy the parts of the recipes that make us more comfortable.

An overall revitalization of the country is not his sole responsibility, of course. E 'responsibility to safeguard your FIAT.

But, an action that brings two years of benefits in exchange for you and a few hundred others at the expense of millions of Italians is not acceptable.

automotive industry in activities there.

producing industries in the West, I say.

My Ford Fiesta 4 years ago in Germany is designed and manufactured in the United Kingdom, but it cost me € 1500 less than the Punto Classic ...

Still, I do not think German and English are subject to the system with your proposal.

Quite the opposite.

We then talk to Ferrari?

Now, I have no experience of industrial administration, it would be presumptuous on my part threw out an action plan.

But a strategic approach, given the various circumstances related to my professionalism and the various skills acquired can also suggest.

The strategic goal, first of all.
establish once and for all.
Then, answer the questions: FIAT to produce in Italy?
If the answer is no way have taken is wrong: it would be better to just quit.
better, because a few thousand early retirements are a small price to pay compared to pakistanizzazione rights and dissolve without the reform of the National Contract Metalworkers.
not intended as abstractions, but as the sum of the lives of many people, all of what his action, Dr. Marchionne, devastate domino effect on the working classes for the weak.
If the answer, however, is yes, that is what has been said before but I would suggest that from the strengths of foreign models in which you want to inspire the public to believe.
Participation Maestranza in decision-making must be associated with the banality the virtuous behavior of successful organizations:
we ask a lot, we give you a lot.
We ask more, we give you less and you do well raspberries is the food for the journey of organizational failure.
From a technological standpoint, then, we are in the desertification.
Where is the promise of strategic innovation? From the perspective of communicative
things are even worse. FIAT
Why is not able to play the card italianity?
That is to act as a spearhead of a new model made in Italy where he worked hard and earned enough to buy what is produced? From a house, you will ... And maybe with an eye environmental sustainability of production?
I, personally, do not chase the drift of production at minimum economic cost with the highest environmental impact associated with the maximum gain in the short term.
not because it is immoral but because it is
suicide: there are many other organizations able to do so much better than I could ever Fiat.
Instead, today, if I were to buy a car, I'd qualms about buying foreign.
Yet once, it was not.
But, thank you, Dr. Marchionne, buy a Chinese car is no longer a taboo for many: the Chinese for the Chinese poor to poor, insulted insulted, looted for looted, at least we had the feeling of not having contributed to its bonus millionaire nor to provide the power base from which to do what he does:
without the productivity of workers in Melfi by which Fiat has sold millions of cars no one in Italy, ; know his name, sorry ...
Last note summary.
E 'approach: "If you do this and that I will do the investment" To be rated at the base.
you, in public, he has not taken adequate infrastructure productive as it could have ...
I do not think there is more to say.

Some Improvised Science Apparatus Details

Marchionne, I'm not the contrary, I raise (Part )

Dear Dr. Marchionne,

letters, also open, you know, begin this way.

Saving riassuntino the readers of the latest new about it.

Before making my counter, however, I need additional data that, months of debate, unfortunately, did not come out at all:

Marchionne, in fact, you should do us the courtesy to explain a lot of things.

First of all, I Mica I forget that your successful business is based on decades of public donations. You are part of much advantage over the competition: it would be courteous to thank me, as a giver of his advantage.

Then, it must explain why a point made by Melfi workers paying € 1,200 ( and where a pizza at the pub costs 10 - 15 €) costs the same as a Polo made in Germany of € workers who take twice that and a pub lunch with birrone costs 5 €.

must also explain to those who plan to sell the Fiat.

I, to affluent with a Fiat do not know a single one!

The demolition of the income of the social class of principal customers FIAT you have constantly advocated and implemented a plan suicide is not too original: it happens already in Italy for almost ten years and it is clear the effect of the collapse of the purchasing power of the middle classes on the national economy. Now, she aims to institutionalize it.

Its action is aimed a strategy of short, very short term, immediate profit at the expense of a social catastrophe: if Torino, Fiat, we can no longer make a pee every four hours, what do you think will happen in Calabria?

Then, we must explain how you can brag about one day of sales of the Grande Punto (built in Melfi) and the day after insult all of the Italian factories futility: who believes he sold, the Grande Punto? For the Swiss billionaire?

She produces worldwide car for low and middle income households which sells largely in Italy.

you are knowingly destroying any chance for your old customers to continue to buy your products.

Moreover, it is true that you can build cars and groped everywhere to do so without the moral support of half of its employees.

E 'even more true that his former clients, I mean the casual, the cassintegrati, the unemployed, the exploited and future, they can buy cars at the best value for money than it sells.

not hide behind your finger, Dr. Marchionne

She tries desperately to where it can compress your costs. But we both know about penalizing the workforce is a palliative for the reasons mentioned above. She also pays very little to its workers. E 'infrastructure You need decent, like the rest of the country. But the lack of which has more responsibility you, as a ruling class, that its workers. That, perhaps, have a different responsibility as voters or the Knight of the League.

It 's true, we have reached a critical point.

It 's true, to produce in China (or in Bangladesh, perhaps) cheaper.

But Dr. Marchionne, about me I'll give you two distinct notes:

you can produce at the price you want, but, as already mentioned, those who wish to sell?

It 'the key of the next decade in China wages doubled. In the West in general, but impoverishing Italy in particular, now the leap of logic starts to get pretty altino and you, Dr. Marchionne, is a philosopher. The only excuse for this.

Who do you think of selling your products at low cost?

also simply ignoring the environmental energy issues ...

The world is changing everyday and the equation "I produce at low prices in the Third World to be competitive in the West is partly false.

addition, Dr. Marchionne, his philosophical training had a hand in this:

wants to impose on its workers' rights in China, the wages ours but it demands a German productivity. Or American. Nor is this clear.

Well, this is called "cake and eat it too." As before, the jump in logic does not really work. Sure, you can groped the same approach to the Reality of the Knight, but, given the consequences, I do not think a great food for the journey. Yet

wanted to buy the Opel. Yet he bought the Chrysler ...

There is nothing wrong with wanting to increase productivity. But, sorry, you have to Melfi already high specific productivity. Only the overall productivity of the Fiat mica is low because the workers are lazy (or have rights twentieth century), is low because you can not sell a sufficient number of FIAT can maintain high production establishments.

If a plant is designed (and paid) to produce 1000 cars per day with 5000 workers but it produces 200 per day with 1000 workers it's not the fault of those thousand if the productivity of the plant is 20%. Even this is something that you did not explain.

you are trying to increase the productivity of the establishment concerned, in practice, trying to bring 20 to 25% at the expense of the thousands of workers ...

No, Dr. Marchionne.

She has certainly done your calculations, but you miss the point of view of the world.

What I would suggest that an alliance and not a permanent war with the workers.

She, unfortunately, compared to the challenges of the XXI century Italy for the company, the intention is painfully outdated and instruments.

course, is only the latest in a long chorus of captains of the Titanic. Titanicitalia.

FOLLOWS

Mario Salieri See Online

Genesis - Invisible Touch - Live Earth HD 720p

Digital Camera Diagram Button

L' I 'IN AND OUT AND ABOUT (1)

L 'I' IN AND OUT AND AROUND

by Sibaldi IGOR on Monday, 25 October 2010 at 19:06

With inexcusable naivete, psychology believes that I can talk about himself in terms oggettivi.Se not, it is not a science, as psychology is precisely the science of self. But it is inevitably built by ' myself. And this is nonsense. To be able to speak objectively about something, you need to know what it is: where is that thing, where it is not, and what are its confini.Ma to draw the boundaries of any area, it should be how the usciti.E Our ego can come out of himself?

Everywhere I arrived to find a will anyway if you can not find stesso.Altrimenti perceive, think alcunchè.Perciò, decides to ask any border, will never be one of its border, or because, to put that line, although it has passed through, and therefore is no longer one of its border or why do not you go away, so it does not know, or do not know where he is, nor whether it is really a border or not.

Evidently psychologists are satisfied with the vague feeling that "I" is still "inside", and what is not "I" and "out" and feeling that derive the belief that a border there sia.Già, but "inside" what?

in the body? In a lifetime? That I am really in the body, is all to dimostrare.Il our body dynamics, faculty, areas of which I know something, and others that know little or nothing, then it is not the same as if you can consider as something to investigate, his body is the estraneo.Che instead I'm in a lifetime, you say too much and too poco.In as part of that period? Not in the future, or at least not this ancora.Nel ? No, because few are able to be in this, and besides, what we call 'present' consists of too many unresolved elements of our past, in order to exist per se.

Then I was in the past? Certainly, our past is made of relationships with many, many people who, the more there for us, in our memory, as we have bridged the content of our self: emotions, feelings, valori.La vast majority of those people , and a good part of every person that we remember, they are even "projections" of contents of the self. So what we exist for the people who make up our past is part of what we call 'I': they are "inside "us, or we are in loro.Ma if so, how and to what extent? For those people that are in us, or we in them, depends on what we perceive, what we see in mondo.Noi perceive what they have learned to perceive, we realize what the words might indicate, and our words are what we have learned, just by other persone.Da what we perceive, from what we see depends on all the choices of our lives and our ways of considerarle.Dalle our choices and our ways of looking at it all depends on what happens to us and this we can accadere.E siamo.Ma this certainly is not "inside." It 's out. From "THE BOOK OF PERSONALITY '" Editions Frassinelli

L' IO IN AND OUT AND ABOUT (1)

Pokemon Emerald Gameshark (mac)

Images (1)

IMAGINATION

by Sibaldi IGOR on Monday, 01 November 2010 at 19:35

that imagination is the only radar from which I have little feel for the Hereafter, it is well known for centuries, only forgotten by our contemporaries. "Imagine with real Imaginatio" recommended the author of "Rosarium philosophorum "(1550) to those who go to the discovery of" one who is inside ", ie its autentitico I, and meant to say: use your imagination so that it captures what is true, that neither the senses nor the reasoning, and intuition can not grasp yet. And Dante: "Imagine all who love or comprehending what I saw dark (and feel the image, and I speak as a steadfast rock). Paradiso XIII 0.1-3

words: those who desire to understand well will imagine, and try to hold down, like a rock in a mountain gorge, the stream of images that will be caught.

Of course this "imaginatio" should not be confused with the invention: the scope of the invention is limited, those who invent always know in advance what to invent, and does not specify that the outlines, the details, but the imagination is always adventurous, is a look beyond, to that still do not understand, and can be read only in the form of-SYMBOLS that is, images whose meaning is not yet known when they are forming in our minds, and that nell'Aldiquà will never find adequate explanation.

"You did not choose me, but I chose you, and I have places to go and bear fruit, and the private seasonal fruit that will last, so that whatever you ask the Father in the name of the ego, I grant "John 15.16

Is not so much of himself and the apostles, that Jesus is speaking here, but rather the contents and forms of 'imaginatio ", the passage means, namely:" are not forms of imagination to create content that speaks to you the your I great, but on the contrary, are those content to choose those forms, and reshape and compose them, to let you create what is new and what is new has no limits: no matter what I, in each of you will know imagine and ask, it shall be given. "

imagination There is only where there is an afterlife of perception, that is a threshold beyond which you start to not knowing, and to see who has soltanto.Per learned to use our imagination, our real world but can show that threshold at any point: everything that can be a peroimìa, a symbol, but only if, watching, you get to see beyond what the world sees; while below that threshold there is only what is already known, that is the opposite of imagination. From "Vocabulary" Soul editions

Images (1)