Heavy Metal Poisoning Milk And Egg As Antidote

The house is kept vacant at the SUV as that entered in a free market is the electric car

consider an SUV.

One of those nice big cars that are seen regularly and illegally roam between Piazza seat, with driver stuck strictly to your phone, and maybe the surroundings of the Villa Comunale.

Apart violations the highway code, what's wrong?

(Open parenthesis: because we have to tolerate the slaughter of Square Seat and related congestion in pedestrian areas? Close parenthesis)

This SUV has been paid a heavy price.

The owner pays us for insurance and road tax, and every time he fills up a large amount of taxes paid to the State.

For very superficial analysis, its theory are made: some like it buy a bag that costs three salaries, some people like it, instead of taking a walk, sit in a kind of tank that uses three times a normal car to make 500 meters.

But it is not.

Why, if our gentileman the example above is free to use its money more or less what he wants, is not free of charge to appropriate other people's property:

to from space occupied, through the safety of other motorists and pedestrians and ending with the air pollution that causes burning so much fuel.

B isogna take the lead in that times have changed, the energy from oil will become very expensive and we can not afford to keep going as if nothing had happened to pollute the atmosphere and to consume natural resources, consume air, water and agricultural soils can no longer be available in the individual in an absolute manner.

For example: When I was little, in front of his uncle's new car on duty, always ask: what is time?
Now I ask: what we consume?
But now I ask: how much pollution?
Same for town planning.

The old houses will become more rove nts in summer and cold winter, we must rethink the city. We need to demolish and rebuild the old houses there, where there is already urbanized land new homes, warm in winter and cool in summer, low or negative energy impact.

why not look with sympathy habit throughout Matera Italy in general and in particular to keep out of the market the second and third homes.

Of course, the owners pay us on ICI and TARSU, everything in order.

Each of its money that makes us think that, again in theory.

Why, of course, that if Matera money is not divested so unproductively is that things can improve so easily, but I digress.

The point is that an apartment is empty artificially coast money to its rightful owner, but also a cost to the community rather than salt that must be borne by the convenience of those who own homes and keep empty.

a cost that, frankly, it's just ridiculously compensated by ICI and TARSU:

the social cost at prices artificially high in a context of high supply and low demand.

the social cost to the inability of many young people to marry and have children, a direct result of very low economic growth.

The ecological cost for using air, water, soil minerals and agricultural commodities that are collective nature of to build unnecessary buildings, not to mention the public money lavished upon them in various ways' building in various guises over the years.

the economic damage inflicted on the public with the false belief that only cemented ports building wealth, as if decades and decades of such policies are not at the base of sconquassi today.

the economic damage suffered by a community free of capital equipment de facto in building the value

Even today, in a field candidates for the title of Capital of the vacant houses that European Capital of Culture 2019, you think you want to boost the economy with the same motivations that led to sack of the city in 30 years.

Predictably, with the prospect of obtaining the same results.

But the building in general, the House plan in particular, in fact, could actually be an opportunity for urban redevelopment, if they were directed to recall the havoc avoid consuming more precious soil, using technologies such as solar energy self-sufficiency.

Be it that a minimum of new development is needed for a variety of economic factors, but there is to tell you that is necessary to give a home to young people, as it is not: a

static situation now offer multi-year high and low demand with prices continually rising it is an argument that does not hold.

Precisely because of the presence in town of a large number of vacant houses.

There is no reason to believe that the reverse phenomenon is building more.

There is no reason to believe that the present situation will improve without taking appropriate action and to encourage the marketing of empty houses.

There is no way to reverse the decline of culture, economic and environmental policy by continuing the same line as always.

Easy, no?

Best Name Of Ragnarok

AND JUST TO BE THERE ...

- Someone who is unable to write, some people just take ... where is the balance between giving and receiving?

In War and Peace there is something very beautiful: the protagonist, who appears already in the first volume of four, and Pierre Bezukhov is a tremendously generous person . Illegitimate son of a Russian nobleman, was actually very poor for a lifetime, and does not understand the value of money ;
when was poor did not care to be poor, and when it suddenly becomes very rich, still does not understand. So much money pours out to all who require it to him, and what he looks very nice.

however does not understand why - despite wanting to be good and giving to all - wrong all the time: people who give money or are not deserving or resent against him ... Eventually (after almost four volumes), and after being held captive by the French etc, discovers he has a kind of talent that does not know how he arrived, he realizes that he can give people which is good to give , and not to those to whom it is good not give. And from that moment is wonderfully observed ... even if he does not know how he came to have this ability.

Tolstoy does not explain it but it suggests to those who can and who is interested in the subject ... that if one asks whether and still wondering, he discovered (maybe after thirty years who read the novel) that there is an episode in which Pierre Bezukhov, deported by the French, going to be killed and close to death, and here he realizes that the thing that gives most trouble to the world and that makes you always wrong when you have consciousness you.

It 's a speech exactly opposite to self-esteem. As soon as you think to yourself and say "but I do what is right and what is right which is not ... etc?", Or follow a line of extreme caution and just end up not only what you choose and even that that your rationality (which is not a great satisfaction in the end, and eventually you get bored) or wrong.

Instead, the secret to finding balance in things is something wonderful but is achieved only for a very long time of growth is I find that your own is not . If you can do without the concept of I , just to be there - without thinking of being there - all your choices regarding giving and receiving are all of them right.

I think it's just an economic factor. Consider a piece of paper and say you represent all the strength I have, for example, for a total of 10 units. If this leaflet looks at himself, must spend part of his strength and then 4 units could be allocated to observation, so the end will have only the remaining 6. But if you're whole, and do not care to do something right or wrong, you're not there to think about it, to control - as if anyone cared that something exists or not - then you are always in balance .. . but this is difficult and can only be achieved through deep personal experience.

From an interview nonsoloanima.tv

ENOUGH TO BE THERE AND ...

Really Tall Converses

House Plan and Town Planning Regulations : I love the plans well managed (Col. John "Hannibal" Smith)

House Plan and Town Planning Regulations (commonly known as Plan).

is the theme of the day, indeed, in the year.

They are not an expert in construction or planning, let alone if I express an opinion to address the current state of uncertainty and information sources.

The housing plan is in its early stages of definition, the urban plan has not yet been submitted.

Also, personally, I refuse to give certificates of rationality to decisions made without knowledge of the state of things.

translate?

Translate:

Today, February 2011, there are many empty houses in the city of Matera and how many people are looking for home?

That is: what is the relationship between supply and demand?

seems like a trivial question, but this argument in that matter, and a real the glass ceiling.

It's easy to understand why.

probably taking all the arguments with the benefit of the doubt due to the absence of reliable data, Matera is already, in fact, a ghost town.

Take a ride in a car at 22 Wednesday in the Cup, when 80% of Materani is glued to the TV.

will see entire buildings in the darkness, only a few buildings with lighted windows, buildings with more off-sale signs that balconies.

both in the center to periphery, both North and South

Matera a city of new buildings that fall.

If you quantify that arrived at for each subject in search of the house there are dozens of empty houses do not think there would be a revolution, after the deafening silence of the rest of the post civil nights Arcore el'acquiescenza also because of the catastrophe economic, what you want it to be a small Southern town where the houses cost four times the minimum price he would just as soon as market conditions are decent?

Empirically, by coming to terms with his nose, I can therefore say that the potential supply is several multiples higher than demand. Home prices, however, are higher than those of some multiple of the congruent market.

A house on the outskirts of 100sqm also costs € 250,000.00, I think it's worth four times that in the circumstances:

Low demand, high supply, intellectual emigration and non-generalized seizure.

Our company has decided that young couples, even university graduates, they can count on an average annual income (and precarious) of about 15 - 20 000 € for the lucky ones.

These numbers tell the whole story.

Moreover, it takes little to realize that companies can finance themselves by selling only a portion of a building and, with the current regime, can afford to wait decades before selling their own money without fear of having to do with the law of supply and demand.

Other numbers, calculated on the basis currently unknown to me, tell us, however, the requirement is 2600 units of housing to be built by 2017.

these numbers will be based on housing plan and the planning rules.

Well does the Secretary of the Party to want to wait for the presentation of the planning rules because it's time to turn the page and end the culture of the emergency plan to start a second reason and not by special interests and local authorities.

Developing a Strategic Plan that goes from general to specific is the only way out of the perverse logic of the exception, emergency, accepting the fait accompli.

Unfortunately, the housing plan is what it is: an exception to the procedures of the planning rules required by the national and Papy, where the new regional government of Basilicata has also taken the opportunity to municipalities to decide the scope of intervention.

It 's true that 40% of dwellings under the House plan are subsidized housing and, therefore, should ease the problem just described here.

It 's true that placing housing market of 2600, again in theory, should the market moderation.

theory.

But, unfortunately, the same theory has already been disproved by the facts: an overabundance of supply to unprecedented levels does not cause a fall in prices.

houses, it is true, can not be built.

But neither are sold.

are preserved, empty, for lack of buyers with the necessary money to spend.

So, for now, keep them empty it costs very little to the owners of the third, fourth and fiftieth homes.

Now, since the the House is a constitutional right, and considering that we live in a Town stracementificata, in a nation where one out of ten square meter is covered with bricks, I think it is profoundly wrong to think of solving the problem by adding cement to the concrete.

We are in 2011 and there are no natural resources to add new cities next to those half-empty, we do not have more money, more arable land, more water, more air contaminates unnecessarily.

Because, although the right to private property is also a constitutional right, there is no constitutional right to possession air and water.

The housing plan is not compulsory, but it is an opportunity that can be exploited for the redevelopment of the city.

The problem in this regard is that the town council has little chance to influence the expressions of interest submitted.

In practice, while there is some faint hope of alleviating the plight of the issue home with 40% of social housing planned in the house (and I reiterate that I do not believe so far for the reasons expressed ), the other a name worthy of the planning rules could help to redevelop the city by modern standards without losing the lot in an area already martyred.

Homes low environmental impact, restructuring and retraining of urbanization and green, alternative energy, possible ways are certainly many, this is not the place to talk about it.

Personally, this line is that I spend in the Secretariat and the Executive, from a political standpoint, but from a more general point of view I'd like it would come to the obvious, which is not granted in this country:

the obvious, to me means making legislatively convenient to put the houses on the market rather than keep them empty (and often even stacked) to hundreds.

A City of empty houses that can not be a Town Sterile.

not building another district Aquarium that will relaunch the economy of the city, but pursuing different solutions from the past that break the vicious cycle that has brought the matter to be a long and almost deserted cement factory in the open.

PS:

course, the word "Sassi" there