by Sibaldi IGOR on Tuesday, 04 January 2011 at 14:11
In my self-analysis do not need anything at all ... is too high because the risk of autoconvincersi certain things, more or less unconsciously seek confirmation on issues and situations but we are already convinced, in terms of being or having.
There is very good idea in psychology - but also in religion - that could be defined simply as container. "I understand" means "to star in a given container." The self-analysis is a way of understanding themselves. If you try to understand yourself, and I say this very simply, you then split into two: the part of you and who understands that part of you that is understood. But this does not work because it means that your "container" is understood that half of you and then you in there, do not get it to stay there in one piece. If you think "now I understand", we split up.
usually for what concerns the discovery of self-reflexive verbs ie "I wonder", "I feel," "I believe," "I wonder ... are crap. And 'much better "ask", "feel", "wonder" "Seems" ... and appears to whom? Others. Then you are much better ... The self-analysis in this sense is a task that "when tired." To have a container and enough power really know anything about him it takes at least two people, then the container in some way is large enough to contain a significant part.
really find yourself when you relate with each other , unlike in most cases they are only illusions, self-deception. It should be another, and can be a real person, a lover, a friend or someone you see only you, but it must be something else besides you . Why religions serve so much, because usually, with the confession, at least you can go from a guy who "has' a bit, it's still a kind of relationship ...
Each person is much larger than themselves and what they think they know that if you autoanalyzer, can see his nail, part of it, but does not see the whole. To see a little 'more to enter into a relationship where you are at least two.
0 comments:
Post a Comment