by Sibaldi IGOR on Monday, 25 October 2010 at 19:06
With inexcusable naivete, psychology believes that I can talk about himself in terms oggettivi.Se not, it is not a science, as psychology is precisely the science of self. But it is inevitably built by ' myself. And this is nonsense. To be able to speak objectively about something, you need to know what it is: where is that thing, where it is not, and what are its confini.Ma to draw the boundaries of any area, it should be how the usciti.E Our ego can come out of himself?
Everywhere I arrived to find a will anyway if you can not find stesso.Altrimenti perceive, think alcunchè.Perciò, decides to ask any border, will never be one of its border, or because, to put that line, although it has passed through, and therefore is no longer one of its border or why do not you go away, so it does not know, or do not know where he is, nor whether it is really a border or not.
Evidently psychologists are satisfied with the vague feeling that "I" is still "inside", and what is not "I" and "out" and feeling that derive the belief that a border there sia.Già, but "inside" what?
in the body? In a lifetime? That I am really in the body, is all to dimostrare.Il our body dynamics, faculty, areas of which I know something, and others that know little or nothing, then it is not the same as if you can consider as something to investigate, his body is the estraneo.Che instead I'm in a lifetime, you say too much and too poco.In as part of that period? Not in the future, or at least not this ancora.Nel ? No, because few are able to be in this, and besides, what we call 'present' consists of too many unresolved elements of our past, in order to exist per se.
Then I was in the past? Certainly, our past is made of relationships with many, many people who, the more there for us, in our memory, as we have bridged the content of our self: emotions, feelings, valori.La vast majority of those people , and a good part of every person that we remember, they are even "projections" of contents of the self. So what we exist for the people who make up our past is part of what we call 'I': they are "inside "us, or we are in loro.Ma if so, how and to what extent? For those people that are in us, or we in them, depends on what we perceive, what we see in mondo.Noi perceive what they have learned to perceive, we realize what the words might indicate, and our words are what we have learned, just by other persone.Da what we perceive, from what we see depends on all the choices of our lives and our ways of considerarle.Dalle our choices and our ways of looking at it all depends on what happens to us and this we can accadere.E siamo.Ma this certainly is not "inside." It 's out. From "THE BOOK OF PERSONALITY '" Editions Frassinelli
0 comments:
Post a Comment