Heavy Metal Poisoning Milk And Egg As Antidote

The house is kept vacant at the SUV as that entered in a free market is the electric car

consider an SUV.

One of those nice big cars that are seen regularly and illegally roam between Piazza seat, with driver stuck strictly to your phone, and maybe the surroundings of the Villa Comunale.

Apart violations the highway code, what's wrong?

(Open parenthesis: because we have to tolerate the slaughter of Square Seat and related congestion in pedestrian areas? Close parenthesis)

This SUV has been paid a heavy price.

The owner pays us for insurance and road tax, and every time he fills up a large amount of taxes paid to the State.

For very superficial analysis, its theory are made: some like it buy a bag that costs three salaries, some people like it, instead of taking a walk, sit in a kind of tank that uses three times a normal car to make 500 meters.

But it is not.

Why, if our gentileman the example above is free to use its money more or less what he wants, is not free of charge to appropriate other people's property:

to from space occupied, through the safety of other motorists and pedestrians and ending with the air pollution that causes burning so much fuel.

B isogna take the lead in that times have changed, the energy from oil will become very expensive and we can not afford to keep going as if nothing had happened to pollute the atmosphere and to consume natural resources, consume air, water and agricultural soils can no longer be available in the individual in an absolute manner.

For example: When I was little, in front of his uncle's new car on duty, always ask: what is time?
Now I ask: what we consume?
But now I ask: how much pollution?
Same for town planning.

The old houses will become more rove nts in summer and cold winter, we must rethink the city. We need to demolish and rebuild the old houses there, where there is already urbanized land new homes, warm in winter and cool in summer, low or negative energy impact.

why not look with sympathy habit throughout Matera Italy in general and in particular to keep out of the market the second and third homes.

Of course, the owners pay us on ICI and TARSU, everything in order.

Each of its money that makes us think that, again in theory.

Why, of course, that if Matera money is not divested so unproductively is that things can improve so easily, but I digress.

The point is that an apartment is empty artificially coast money to its rightful owner, but also a cost to the community rather than salt that must be borne by the convenience of those who own homes and keep empty.

a cost that, frankly, it's just ridiculously compensated by ICI and TARSU:

the social cost at prices artificially high in a context of high supply and low demand.

the social cost to the inability of many young people to marry and have children, a direct result of very low economic growth.

The ecological cost for using air, water, soil minerals and agricultural commodities that are collective nature of to build unnecessary buildings, not to mention the public money lavished upon them in various ways' building in various guises over the years.

the economic damage inflicted on the public with the false belief that only cemented ports building wealth, as if decades and decades of such policies are not at the base of sconquassi today.

the economic damage suffered by a community free of capital equipment de facto in building the value

Even today, in a field candidates for the title of Capital of the vacant houses that European Capital of Culture 2019, you think you want to boost the economy with the same motivations that led to sack of the city in 30 years.

Predictably, with the prospect of obtaining the same results.

But the building in general, the House plan in particular, in fact, could actually be an opportunity for urban redevelopment, if they were directed to recall the havoc avoid consuming more precious soil, using technologies such as solar energy self-sufficiency.

Be it that a minimum of new development is needed for a variety of economic factors, but there is to tell you that is necessary to give a home to young people, as it is not: a

static situation now offer multi-year high and low demand with prices continually rising it is an argument that does not hold.

Precisely because of the presence in town of a large number of vacant houses.

There is no reason to believe that the reverse phenomenon is building more.

There is no reason to believe that the present situation will improve without taking appropriate action and to encourage the marketing of empty houses.

There is no way to reverse the decline of culture, economic and environmental policy by continuing the same line as always.

Easy, no?