I do not know why, but instead to design and implement a line, lately it seems that in PD, if it goes well, we are asked what we prefer.
Among options to the bottom.
Favorites Vendola or stone?
Favorites or Peter Casini?
favorite casino or Rutelli?
How about if we damn Binetti with the devil? And if
to defeat Berlusconi should go hand in hand with Fini as well (the Bossi-Fini Law, and I said it all)?
Now, this is not one of the famous blog of elders of the party, but I can also afford to say that one is in the PD because they prefer it to be its leader to propose a course of reform of the Left and rights of Catholic social thought ( since the PD has a genetic component itself Catholic obtain the best value is mainly in respect of the reactionary forces nested in the church hierarchy stubbornly still aligned in support of anti-Catholic politicians in this regard).
I would prefer that it was my Secretary to propose strategies to break with the past in order to build even electoral alliances, but also a proposal from the PD unit, and above all shared at all levels.
If its not possible, but really, only then, maybe, maybe, we might as well accept that the break is another man outside the party.
But it is a someone whose not ashamed to advance.
With the third prong, abstract entity which exists only the definition of concrete, with no political weight if not functional to vote against Bondi, as against The Big B. or a governicchio is insufficient, we can only accidentally converge locally in the parliamentary vote. Any other
ratio is worse than a mistake: it is a suicide. So
: Primary for the candidates and alliance with organic Vendola and Di Pietro (but for goodness sake, mandiamogli a political commissar to examine the candidates first and then let us make our screening well ...).
Possibly tomorrow, since we are late for yesterday.
0 comments:
Post a Comment